Dating antique catalogs of medical instruments

Brambilla, Giovanni Alessandro. Instrumentarium chirurgicum militare Austriacum, Vienna, 1782.

Establishing the publication date of a medical trade catalog (catalogues in British spelling) is not always trivial. Many medical instrument manufacturers did without catalogs for many years – there was simply no need for them. Before the 19th century trade catalogs did not exist and illustrations and descriptions of instruments could be found either in books devoted to instruments or in surgical treatises. Then, when the first trade catalogs of medical and surgical instruments appeared, they often omitted the date of their publications. There is a very trivial practical explanation for this – a printed edition could be distributed to the last copy for several years without fear that customers would resent "outdated" samples. 

Such editions, which do not contain imprints or other output data, can be very difficult to determnie the year of publication. A solution would be to date them by the design of the instruments they contained. But such dating only defines the boundary of "published at the earliest". What about the upper boundary, "not later"? Even the replacement of ebony and ivory handles with steel, which were more resistant to sterilization, provides only a very rough window of three-four decades. Many firms continued to produce instruments in traditional materials long after the discovery of antisepsis (1865) by Joseph Lister and the invention of the autoclave (1879) by Charles Chamberland and finally this shift from wood and bone to stainless steel for manufacturing surgical instrument handles occurred in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Another way to determine the approximate publication date of undated catalogs is to analyze the fonts, layout, and other typographical features characteristic of a particular era. Below are covers of medical instruments from European and American manufacturers whose year of publication is known. By comparing them to undated catalogs, the approximate period of publication can be more accurately determined.

 

1867, France

1867-L-Mathieu-Paris. From Wellcome Library

1867. L. Mathieu, Paris, France. Source: Wellcome library. Link to the full-text: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/mcmnx8ay/items 

 

 

More info

warning-red Found mistake? Select text and press Ctrl+Enter (for Mac: Cmd+Enter)

See also

Poor condition rating C3 may have noticeable damage or significant signs of wear, major scratches, dents, or even parts that are broken or missing. Items may require restoration
Conditions ratings

In the world of collecting antiques of medical instruments are often graded based on their condition. The ratings like C1, C2, and C3 are used to indicate the state of preservation and the amount of wear or damage an item has sustained over time. C1 – excellent condition, with minimal signs of wear or use and retains most of its original features and functionality. C2 – good condition but may show more evident signs of wear or aging. C3 – fair or poor condition with noticeable damage or significant signs of wear.

De humani corporis fabrica libri septem (1555) by Andreas Vesalius, photo by Christie's
A wonderful transformation of the Ugly Duckling

The story of how the second edition of the book De humani corporis fabrica libri septem, by Flemish Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564), desecrated by numerous marginal notes, became one of the most outstanding examples of scientific printing that has come down to us has shocked the world of medical history and bibliography. This book, first published in 1543, then revolutionised anatomy and, among of others, commented on about 200 mistakes and misconceptions of the infallible authority, Claudius Galenus, questioning more than a thousand years of anatomical beliefs. It is no wonder that the young genius (Andreas Vesalius was only 29 years old when by publishing his Opus magnum) faced not just significant opposition, but fierce hatred, a real mass shitstorm for questioning established views, rocking the comfortable chairs of professorial chairs.

Blade of non lancet
Fake lancet – triple disappointment

Everyone who deals with antiques sooner or later encounters fakes, collectors of surgical instruments and medical historians are no exception. One of the most frequently counterfeited, or rather issued with fake description – is the lancet, perhaps the most commonly used instrument of the surgeon up to the beginning of the 20th century. The classic antique surgical lancet was an instrument used for opening abscesses, phlebotomy (bloodletting) and other procedures requiring a precise and minimal incision. In appearance, it resembled a small, thin, pointed, double-edged knife that allowed the doctor to make clean and precise incisions. The presented specimen appeared to be not a "silver Victorian lancet", but something else...

Wellcome Catalog of Printed Books
Important Catalogs of Historical Medical Books

To find the right path in the ocean of historical books, we can turn to some catalogs of the most important examples of historical literature in medicine. The most respected for their thoroughness and historical value are seminal resources for researchers looking for rare and important medical books of the past. References to their records are often found in the reference departments of university libraries and specialized institutions and are often cited by booksellers of scientific and antiquarian books: Wellcome Historical Medical Library Catalogue; Garrison-Morton's Medical Bibliography; Hirsch's Biographisches Lexikon der hervorragenden Ärzte; Osler's Bibliotheca Osleriana; The Bibliotheca Walleriana; The Harvey Cushing Catalogue; Heirs of Hippocrates; Catalogue of the History of Medicine Collection in the National Library of Medicine.